Our office remains open to serve your important legal needs during these turbulent and challenging times. We are happy to schedule client consultations and client meetings by telephone or video-conference at your request.
Bryan E. Kuhn
Counselor at Law, P.C.
Business & Employment Law Attorney

Controversial patent review program upheld by appellate court

As we have discussed in past posts on our blog, patents are granted to inventors by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as a way of preventing others from making, selling or using an invention for a certain amount of time.

But since the USPTO is in the business of promoting technological progress, an invention has to be “novel” or “nonobvious” in order for a patent to be granted.

After a patent has been granted and the inventor believes that someone is infringing upon it, the inventor can file a claim in court. Traditionally, patent infringement lawsuits played out through litigation; however, in 2012, a new program known as inter partes review was created.

Inter partes review essentially gives the USPTO the power to invalidate the patent, putting an abrupt end to the litigation. It is something that big tech companies like Google and Apple have been relying on heavily to reduce litigation costs after being accused of patent infringement.

In fact, a former judge calls the inter partes review board a “death squad” for patents, so as you can imagine, most patent holders and their attorneys are not fond of the process.

Much to their dismay, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently validated the program in a case involving a patent for a speed limit indicator, Bloomberg Business reported.

In the case, the patent holder had sued various companies for infringement. In return, one of the companies filed a review petition with the USPTO, which invalidated the patent after finding that the speed limit indicator was an obvious variation of existing inventions.

The patent holder then appealed, questioning the validity of the USPTO’s inter partes review process. In its decision, the top patent court held that the inter partes review program is legitimate and its finding in the case should stand.

Since the decision was split, though, it is possible that the patent holder will ask for a review by the entire nine-judge Court of Appeals panel, which could reach a different decision. An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is also possible. We will keep you posted.

Column Image

“I used the Bryan E. Kuhn, Counselor at Law, P.C. team to help me with a case. They were always professional, upfront, and positive providing guidance while keeping me informed.”
– L.H.

“Everyone at the firm was professional, responsive and courteous. I would definitely recommend this firm if you are in need of superior legal assistance.”
– J.S.

“Bryan and his law firm operate with great professionalism and personal touch. I appreciated the way he and his team offered transparent communication.”
– N.S.

“The team was very professional in helping me to get through an uncomfortable ADA situation at my workplace. This was a very good legal experience. I would recommend Bryan E. Kuhn & team to anyone who needs work related legal help.”
– D.L.

“Bryan, Katie, and all the staff in this office are super fast to respond, expert in their fields, and always helpful. We have been extremely pleased with their services for our small business.”
– T.Z.

Column Image


Bg Subscribe
Contact Our Firm

Office Location

Bryan E. Kuhn, Counselor at Law, P.C.
1660 Lincoln Street Suite 2330
Denver, CO 80264

Local: 303-424-4286
Toll Free: 866-693-5541
Fax: 303-425-4013
Denver Law Office Map
FindLaw Network
Click for the BBB Business Review of this Attorneys & Lawyers - Employment Litigation in Denver CO